Official NGADM audio review
Although i had different submissions to review on, i particularily wanted to take a bite off yours as well. It is very bold of you to make an extraordinarily structured track for a contest like NGADM. I even think it is unusual to hear it in prog house scene, but I like your guts with an attempt do create and submit something like this.
I have to be very critical about your submission since progressive house needs to be as precise and clean as possible. To be exact, I need to balance out the categories with other submissions. Maybe yours isn't that focused on sound design, but on atmosphere and structure.
The track starts right off the bat with a pretty complex groove right away. I think it would be more natural to start it with a singular kick drum and the shaker pattern to make it even more progressive and interesting. The progression kicks off pretty fast, and thats alright, but make sure you're adding the elements consistently. What I think about too is probably making the transition more prominent and with some hints that another element is coming. For example the percussion groove starts playing abruptly at 01:02 and the break at 01:48 does it too. What I'd reccommend is adding risers or automating the reverb of some elements.
I like the resonant BP acid stabs in the background and the pads coming after the second minute however they don't really make me excited throughout the entire 2 minutes. What I mean is that moment is very bland in terms of arrangement and progression even with some crashes here and there, the pattern sounds the same and its predictable. Make it more intuitive and saturated with elements. I think you maybe overdid it of making it super minimalistic.
The part after 4 minutes is though what makes the track interesting. The transition to piano with the kick being removed was a nice little touch and the sound choice is great. I think the percussion is a bit too loud in that part though and it should be regulated with automation whether its filters or gain. The outro is very soothing, maybe richer pads and more bass could make the outro more dominant and prolific. The pads sound a bit cheap imo. Really like the automation you've put there in the end.
From a mixing standpoint the track is very clean, almost perfect. The hats have some resonance over at 13.5K and that's what makes the ears a bit tired. It would be good to add a low mid dip on the master over around 200hz to make the mix less boomy, and maybe balance out the stereo field. There are no phasing issues whatsoever, but it's very inconsistent in some parts. The pads are less mono compatible than other elements.
So with a little bias, I think it's very hard to judge a track with a structure like yours, and what's making this complicated for you, is that you need to maintain your listener's interest throughout the entire track until the outro. It's not really clever to submit a track that needs to have this type of criteria to a contest, when other submissions make a regular spoiled GP listener way more excited in a span of 3 minutes and less. I kinda know progressive house you do, it's very hard to understand it as a regular listener. I wrote some points a bit too harshly on purpose so you can think how much can your track affect the listeners experience, and honestly I had to re-listen to it a couple of times and change my score because of some changes I did not even notice at first. For a contest, make atleast the changes a bit more unpredictable yet a lot more prominent, "with a little bias."
wish you the best in this contest. hope youll make another house track next round ;D
-CRY